Pool leak detection · Orlando, FL · leakteam.com
Prepared by REK Marketing & Design
Strong Google Business Profile, but a duplicate listing is diluting your reviews.
Fix the duplicateYou dominate the Map Pack for "pool leak" right in your core Orlando area, ranking #1 in 30 of 49 grid points. But AI search doesn't know you exist, and thin service pages are leaving money on the table. These three fixes address the gaps that matter most.
ChatGPT and Gemini named you in 0 of 6 local pool leak answers. Aaron's Leak Detection, American Leak Detection, and Red Rhino are taking that share of voice. Add FAQ schema, quotable content, and an llms.txt file to become citable.
Unlocks AI visibilityYou have a second profile with 17 reviews splitting your authority. Google support has been slow, but this is worth escalating.
Consolidates trustThe plumbing leaks and electrical leaks pages don't make it clear these are pool services. They reuse the same photo multiple times and have minimal content. Unique, detailed pages rank better and convert better.
Fixes content gapsFlorida Leak Locators has built something most pool service companies would envy: a 4.8-star Google rating with 320 reviews, and #1 Map Pack rankings for "pool leak" across most of the Orlando metro. That's the result of good work and happy customers.
The problem is what's not working. AI search engines don't mention you at all. When we asked ChatGPT and Gemini for pool leak detection in Orlando, they named Aaron's Leak Detection, American Leak Detection, and Red Rhino. You weren't in any of the six answers. That's a growing channel you're currently invisible in.
The site itself is technically sound, with 120 indexable pages, proper canonicals, and no major crawl errors. But 73 images are missing alt text, 58 pages have titles over 60 characters, and the service pages for plumbing and electrical leaks are thin and confusing. A visitor might not realize those are pool-related services at all.
There's also the duplicate GBP issue. A second profile with 17 reviews is diluting your authority and confusing Google's entity understanding. Resolving this would strengthen your local foundation.
4.8 stars, 320 reviews, #1 Map Pack for "pool leak" in 61% of grid points. Your Orlando presence is strong. The site is technically clean with 120 indexable pages and no crawl errors.
0 mentions in 6 AI answers. Thin content on plumbing/electrical leak pages. 73 images missing alt text. Duplicate GBP with 17 reviews.
Competitors winning AI mentions have weaker local signals than you. Add FAQ schema, quotable content, and an llms.txt file to become the citable source for pool leak detection in Orlando.
Your site allows all 14 AI crawlers and has Organization schema in place. But you're not being cited in AI answers because you lack the quotable, structured content that models pull from. ChatGPT and Gemini named competitors like Aaron's Leak Detection and Red Rhino instead.
We asked ChatGPT and Gemini for pool leak detection in Orlando six times. You weren't mentioned once. Aaron's Leak Detection appeared 3 times, American Leak Detection and Red Rhino each appeared twice. This is a growing channel where you have no presence.
GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, and 10 others can all access your site. No blocks in robots.txt.
You have WebSite, Organization, ImageObject, and WebPage schema. Add LocalBusiness and FAQPage to complete the picture.
This file helps AI crawlers understand your business quickly. Most competitors don't have one either, so adding it is a differentiator.
FAQ schema is one of the strongest signals for AI citation. Your site has none. Add it to service pages with real customer questions.
The 66/100 GEO score reflects good crawler access and basic schema, but the lack of FAQ content and zero AI mentions are holding you back from the visibility your local reputation deserves.
In traditional local search, you're ahead. But AI search is a different game, and competitors with weaker local signals are getting cited because they have more quotable, structured content.
| Competitor | AI mentions (of 6) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Florida Leak Locators (you) | 0 | Not mentioned in any AI answer |
| Aaron's Leak Detection | 3 | Most-cited competitor |
| American Leak Detection of Orlando | 2 | National brand, local franchise |
| Red Rhino | 2 | Strong content presence |
| Leak Detection Specialists | 1 | |
| The Pool Leak Detection Company | 1 | |
| Aquatic Leak Detection | 1 | |
| Orlando Pool Leak Detection | 1 |
Source: AI mention audit, July 2026. We asked ChatGPT and Gemini "Who does pool leak detection in Orlando?" three times each. Your 320 Google reviews and #1 Map Pack rankings don't translate to AI visibility because AI models pull from structured, quotable content, not review counts.
Aaron's and Red Rhino have detailed FAQ sections and service pages with clear, quotable sentences. AI models cite content they can extract and attribute. Your pages have the information but not in a format AI prefers.
You have more reviews and better Map Pack coverage than the competitors getting AI mentions. If you add the content structure they have, you should outrank them in AI answers too. The foundation is already there.
The site is technically healthy with 120 indexable pages, no 4xx or 5xx errors, and proper self-referencing canonicals. But there are content and optimization issues worth fixing. Tap any row to see the details.
The Lighthouse SEO score is perfect at 100, and the crawl found no 4xx or 5xx errors. The main speed issue is mobile LCP at 4.4 seconds, likely from unoptimized images. The 118 redirects in the crawl are mostly clean 301s, not a concern.
For "pool leak" searches, you rank #1 in 30 of 49 grid points and appear in the top 3 for 61% of the Orlando metro. That's excellent. But there are profile issues to fix and expansion opportunities to capture.
The duplicate profile issue: You share the "Florida Leak Locators" name with two other locations (Clearwater and Pompano Beach) that were sold to different owners. This creates confusion when people search the brand name. More urgently, you have a duplicate Orlando profile with 17 reviews that you've been trying to remove. Keep escalating with Google support. Those 17 reviews should be on your main profile.
The duplicate profile is diluting your authority. Document it thoroughly and escalate through Google Business Profile support.
Your "pool maintenance" rankings drop to position 4-9 in the northern and eastern edges of the grid. Location-specific content for those areas could extend your #1 coverage. You're already strong in the core; now widen the radius.
Each square is a search run from that spot on the map. Green means you land in the top 3 of the Map Pack there. For "pool leak" you're #1 in most of the core Orlando area.
You already have the hard part: a dominant local presence and hundreds of happy customers. The work now is making that visible to AI search and fixing the content gaps that are costing you conversions.
You've built something competitors can't easily replicate: 320 reviews and #1 local rankings. The next step is making sure AI search knows about it too. Let's start with the GEO fixes and content rewrites.
Book the strategy call →Everything above, with the specifics. Tap each block to open it.
Florida Leak Locators shares its name with two other locations: one in Clearwater and one in Pompano Beach. These are separate businesses with separate owners. The original owner opened the Pompano Beach location, sold it, then opened Clearwater, sold it, and finally opened Orlando (the current owner). The three owners agreed to share the name but operate independently with separate domains. They only collaborate on an annual pool show.
This creates brand confusion when someone searches "Florida Leak Locators" and sees multiple locations. More urgently, the Orlando location has a duplicate Google Business Profile with 17 reviews that the owner has been trying to remove through Google support without success. This should be escalated with documentation.
Site crawl via Screaming Frog, PageSpeed Insights for Core Web Vitals, local grid analysis for Map Pack positions, AI mention audit via ChatGPT and Gemini queries, GBP visibility check via public profile data. July 2026.
The spam score of 36 is moderate and worth monitoring but not alarming. The 118 redirects are clean 301s from URL structure changes, not a problem. CLS and INP data were not available in PageSpeed results.
